The Sutton Report clearly exposes the fact that when it comes to
deception, Ken Littleton is an absolute master and anybody who doubts
his guilt is too gullible to take seriously.
"I have a definite feeling in my mind," he told our investigator,
"that this murder was committed after 10:30 at night." "Why do you
say that? he was asked. "Because," he responded cryptically.
The investigators inappropriately cleared Ken Littleton, because, in
their words:
"... the perpetrator was most likely in a state of severe psychosis and
intoxication. While we have indication that both Tommy and Michael were
under the influence of alcohol, and possibly drugs, that night,
Littleton seems to have been clean in that regard."
Clearly, if the investigators knew about Ken Littletone's psychological illness, they would have in a better position to appreciate the fact that Ken Littleton was indeed, "under the influence" on the night that Martha Moxley was murdered.
Ken Littleton suffers from Bipolar disorder, a ferocious mental illness which makes life extremely challenging. It is a very volatile illness which can be
triggered by a traumatic event. It appears, that Ken Littleton was an undiagnosed bipolar on the day he evidently murdered Martha Moxley.
Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel on the night that Martha Moxley was murdered, and that made 15-year old Michael the ideal scapegoat.
Ken Littleton's "alibi" is conclusive:
"My first night at the Skakel house was Oct. 30, 1975. I never met or saw Martha Moxley before Oct. 30, 1975, or after Oct. 30, 1975."
Since Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel on the night that Martha Moxley was murdered, his alibi is not credible, and the fact that he needed to invent one speaks for itself.
According to Michael Skakel, Littleton asked him about Martha Moxley, and that makes absolute sense. The contrary pretense is silly unless Ken Littleton simply required an alibi to evade accountability for having murdered Martha Moxley.
The Sutton Report's free-flow speculation provides the opportunity to
accuse anybody of the murder of Martha Moxley, but a thorough analysis
identifies a single murderer, and that person is Ken Littleton. The erroneous conclusion that Ken Littleton was not "under the influence" is simply not sustainable because Ken Littleton's entire life was dictated by his psychological instability.
The Sutton Report is not without merit because it identified the right
questions...but it has failed to answer them, and it is about time...
To quote directly from the Sutton Report:
"... to say, as he [Ken Littleton] has, that he didn't even notice
her [Martha Moxley] at all seems to be going too far in the other
direction. She was in the house that evening on at least two occasions.
By most accounts, she was very attractive and out-going. She and Tommy
were cavorting very publicly by side of the house. Why wouldn't
Littleton have noticed her? If he had, what would keep him from
admitting that?"
These are the questions appropriately asked and not answered in the
Sutton Report, the lapse is not excusable, and it's about time...
Q: Why wouldn't Littleton have noticed Martha Moxley?
A: Ken Littleton needed an alibi.
Q: If Ken Littleton had noticed Martha Moxley, what would keep him from
admitting that?"
A: The obsession to cover up the fact that bipolar sufferer, Ken
Littleton murdered Martha Moxley.
The Sutton Report accurately depicted the turmoil that governs
Litttleton's life through rhetoric like:
"While there is no doubt Littleton was profoundly affected by Martha
Moxley's murder and its subsequent investigation, to what end his
problems can be attributed to this event is uncertain. He is a haunted
man, but why? Is he somehow responsible?
Is he involved in some complicity, some conspiracy?
Ken Littleton is a wild card--literally and figuratively. If he is
entirely innocent of any involvement in the murder of Martha Moxley, he
has certainly gone to great lengths to make it seem otherwise."
The claim "to what end his problems can be attributed to this event
[the murder of Martha Moxley] is uncertain" is rather silly because
people like Ken Littleton are not "wildcards", they are psychologically disturbed people who are "under the influence" that is responsible for the murder of Martha Moxley.
Indeed, to quote directly from the Sutton report, Ken Litleton did not
have a life, he had a series of crime spree incidents.
"Littleton's crime spree on Nantucket, which he attributed to his
drinking problem, brought him swiftly to the forefront of speculation
in the investigation of Martha Moxley's murder. The Greenwich Police
Department's efforts to attach the crime to Tommy Skakel had proven
futile. Their focus now shifted. Defenders of Littleton insist the
continued harassment of the Greenwich Police--who frequently questioned
Littleton while he was working--lead to his dismissal from teaching
jobs.
Littleton probably did lose teaching jobs because of his status as a
suspect and the Greenwich Police's continued efforts to build a case
against him, but he has only himself to blame for their interest. His
foolish crimes on Nantucket were a red flag to investigators.
Furthermore, to this day, he has left many questions unanswered about
his actions and whereabouts on the night of October 30, 1975."
Ken Littleton cleverly blames drinking problems for his "crime spree"
but the truth is, alcohol was merely an aggravating factor, it is
not the cause of his psychological disorder.
Ken
Littleton was not the "wild card" he was the "wild man" who was never able to demonstrate
the capacity to control his own life. To quote from
the Sutton Report:
"Again, it is difficult to sift through the real and the paranoid when
listening to the voice of Ken Littleton. We must remember, he is a man
with a genetic and socio-cultural predisposition to bipolar mood
disorder stemming from stressful occurrences, from which he now
suffers. He is also a serious alcoholic, allegedly "recovering"
through the assistance of twelve-step programs.
We must consider that Littleton may be a guilty man, haunted by his
actions, who seeks for the sake of self-interest to protect himself by
throwing speculation towards others. For all his problems and pitiable
weaknesses, he is still an intelligent and potentially conniving
convicted felon who has failed two lie-detector tests regarding the
murder of Martha Moxley."
The possibility that Littleton is a completely innocent man, merely
haunted by the specter of suspicion, is absolutely not credible,
because Ken Littleton now claims he has direct knowledge of the
fact that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley, a that is a huge departure from the previous claim that
he hadn't noted anything suspicious.
Ken Littleton's consistent obsession to manufacture an alibi is a clear and convincing demonstration regarding the depth of Ken Littleton's criminal culpability.
Clearly, it is not possible to talk about Ken Littleton and
crime spree in a separate breath, and the Sutton Report summarized some
of the allegations in the following manner:
"Unfortunately, there are many issues with regards to Ken Littleton
that need further investigation and clarification before any resolution
can be reached as to his possible involvement in the murder of Martha
Moxley. As mentioned earlier in this section, a great number of
allegations and innuendos have been made against Littleton,
particularly after Greenwich Police Detectives Soloman [Solomon] and
Garr recently intensified their interest in him. According to Ken, he
willingly submitted to their questioning, but finally relented after it
was clear he was being given "the naked light-bulb treatment." Some
of the allegations are as follows:
1) Ken Littleton had some sort of a
sexual encounter with the wife of a fellow teacher from the Brunswick
school at a softball picnic during the Spring of 1976. Although there
were no charges brought, it has been alleged that Littleton was
attempting to rape her. [Incidentally, Martha's panties were rolled down, exposing her in a vulgar manner, a sign that Ken Littleton had evidently treated her with the same level of disrespect.]
2) Other somewhat similar incidents of teenaged
girls bludgeoned to death are alleged to have occurred in close
proximity to Littleton's whereabouts.
3) Littleton was arrested for
DWI and Assault and Battery, after having been driving the wrong way
down a street frequented by prostitutes. He mumbled that 'he had to
speak to the Kennedys.' "
It is extremely difficult to understand how this psychologically disturbed man who is obsessed with the Kennedys, has evaded criminal prosecution all his life, for the murder of Martha Moxley, but that does not change the fact that he evidently murdered Martha Moxley.
Clearly, Ken Littleton's troubled life would satisfy most reasonable
people that he is a dangerous criminal who does not deserve life without supervision.
To quote directly from the Sutton Report:
"1) Within a year of the murder, Littleton was given and failed two
polygraph tests. At first, Littleton claimed he was being represented
by Tommy's attorney, Manny Margolis, but then retained John
Meerbergen.
2) After making a full confession with regards to his crime
spree on Nantucket, Littleton is given a 5-7 year suspended sentence in
May of 1977. He refused to submit to a sodium amytal interview
regarding the murder of Martha Moxley in exchange for a reduced charge.
3) Littleton was arrested at least three times in Orlando, Florida. On
February 14, 1982, his [WW] is convicted on charges of trespassing and
disorderly conduct. When arrested, he gives a false name. On February
28, 1982, he is convicted of disorderly conduct again.
On March 3, 1982, Littleton is convicted of shoplifting. We know he was
drinking heavily at this point.
4) In subsequent years, he was arrested
for numerous Driving While Intoxicated offenses. The period when
Littleton was in Florida, however, is of special portent. Martha
Moxley's father, before his passing, recorded in his papers that
Littleton called him at that time and expressed condolence for
Martha's death, saying he wanted to take a sodium pentathol test to
help solve the case. When asked about this call by our investigator in
Boston, Littleton initially denied ever speaking with Mr. Moxley. He
claimed that only his wife had actually spoke [sp] to Mr. Moxley. When
later confronted with the specific recollections of the call from Mr.
Moxley's personal papers, Littleton conceded he may have spoken to
him while in a state of severe intoxication, stating, "Maybe I spoke
to him when I was really shit-faced."
In the final analysis, the Sutton Report is a bizarre document because
it implicates Ken Littleton through fact and clears him through
speculation. It is time to recognize the facts.
Even the media has exposed the lunacy that governs Ken Littleton, and
this is another, direct quote from the Sutton Report:
"A couple of years ago, the tabloid television program, A Current
Affair, ambushed Littleton in Canada for an expose-style interview.
Anxious, stuttering, and shaking uncontrollably, Ken initially tried to
flee the encounter, but then awkwardly relented. He made a few comments
and answered some questions while remaining just barely within the
realm of coherence. He is a man who suffers from severe depression and
alcoholism, and his demeanor is inherently disabled. In this regard, he
is his own worst accuser."
In conclusion, the Sutton Report clearly indicates that the claim that
Michael or Tommy Skakel had anything to do with the murder of Martha
Moxley is subject to prejudicial analysis. The claim that Ken Littleton
murdered Martha Moxley is only subject to unanswered questions. It is
time to answer the questions; Ken Littleton is his own worst accuser
when it comes to trying to make any sense out of the murder of Martha Moxley.
Michael Skakel does not deserve to be in jail simply because Ken Littleton is a cunning liar and a very sick man.
» edited
01-10-2009
