Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web

Michael Skakel and Mickey Sherman
Michael Skakel and Mickey Sherman

Scott Peterson Trial: Timeline

1/30/03  DIVERTING BLAME
2/21/03 EARLY REPORTS
3/16/03 SUSPICIOUS MINDS
3/21/03  AMBER FREY
4/04/03  MEDIA SPIN
4/10/03  SMOKING GUN?
3/16/03  MARK GERAGOS
5/07/03  TERRORIZING WITNESSES
9/23/03  JAILHOUSE SNITCHES
10/20/03  LARRY KING LIVE TAKEOVER
11/22/03  CONNER PETERSON
01/14/04  CENSORING THE TRUTH
02/06/04  THE REAL SCOOP
02/16/04  VIVIAN MITCHELL DIES
02/18/04  WHO IS FRAMING SCOTT
10/22/04  JURY TAMPERING
CSI  FORENSIC SCIENCE
Michael Skakel and Mickey Sherman

Sutton Report implicates Ken Littleton

by Jeff Falcon

The Sutton Report clearly exposes the fact that when it comes to deception, Ken Littleton is an absolute master and anybody who doubts his guilt is too gullible to take seriously.

"I have a definite feeling in my mind," he told our investigator, "that this murder was committed after 10:30 at night." "Why do you say that? he was asked. "Because," he responded cryptically.

The investigators inappropriately cleared Ken Littleton, because, in their words:

"... the perpetrator was most likely in a state of severe psychosis and intoxication. While we have indication that both Tommy and Michael were under the influence of alcohol, and possibly drugs, that night, Littleton seems to have been clean in that regard."

Clearly, if the investigators knew about Ken Littletone's psychological illness, they would have in a better position to appreciate the fact that Ken Littleton was indeed, "under the influence" on the night that Martha Moxley was murdered.

Ken Littleton suffers from Bipolar disorder, a ferocious mental illness which makes life extremely challenging. It is a very volatile illness which can be triggered by a traumatic event. It appears, that Ken Littleton was an undiagnosed bipolar on the day he evidently murdered Martha Moxley.

Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel on the night that Martha Moxley was murdered, and that made 15-year old Michael the ideal scapegoat.

Ken Littleton's "alibi" is conclusive:

"My first night at the Skakel house was Oct. 30, 1975. I never met or saw Martha Moxley before Oct. 30, 1975, or after Oct. 30, 1975."

Since Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel on the night that Martha Moxley was murdered, his alibi is not credible, and the fact that he needed to invent one speaks for itself.

According to Michael Skakel, Littleton asked him about Martha Moxley, and that makes absolute sense. The contrary pretense is silly unless Ken Littleton simply required an alibi to evade accountability for having murdered Martha Moxley.

The Sutton Report's free-flow speculation provides the opportunity to accuse anybody of the murder of Martha Moxley, but a thorough analysis identifies a single murderer, and that person is Ken Littleton. The erroneous conclusion that Ken Littleton was not "under the influence" is simply not sustainable because Ken Littleton's entire life was dictated by his psychological instability.

The Sutton Report is not without merit because it identified the right questions...but it has failed to answer them, and it is about time... To quote directly from the Sutton Report:

"... to say, as he [Ken Littleton] has, that he didn't even notice her [Martha Moxley] at all seems to be going too far in the other direction. She was in the house that evening on at least two occasions. By most accounts, she was very attractive and out-going. She and Tommy were cavorting very publicly by side of the house. Why wouldn't Littleton have noticed her? If he had, what would keep him from admitting that?"

These are the questions appropriately asked and not answered in the Sutton Report, the lapse is not excusable, and it's about time...

Q: Why wouldn't Littleton have noticed Martha Moxley? A: Ken Littleton needed an alibi.

Q: If Ken Littleton had noticed Martha Moxley, what would keep him from admitting that?" A: The obsession to cover up the fact that bipolar sufferer, Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley.

The Sutton Report accurately depicted the turmoil that governs Litttleton's life through rhetoric like:

"While there is no doubt Littleton was profoundly affected by Martha Moxley's murder and its subsequent investigation, to what end his problems can be attributed to this event is uncertain. He is a haunted man, but why? Is he somehow responsible?

Is he involved in some complicity, some conspiracy?

Ken Littleton is a wild card--literally and figuratively. If he is entirely innocent of any involvement in the murder of Martha Moxley, he has certainly gone to great lengths to make it seem otherwise."

The claim "to what end his problems can be attributed to this event [the murder of Martha Moxley] is uncertain" is rather silly because people like Ken Littleton are not "wildcards", they are psychologically disturbed people who are "under the influence" that is responsible for the murder of Martha Moxley.

Indeed, to quote directly from the Sutton report, Ken Litleton did not have a life, he had a series of crime spree incidents.

"Littleton's crime spree on Nantucket, which he attributed to his drinking problem, brought him swiftly to the forefront of speculation in the investigation of Martha Moxley's murder. The Greenwich Police Department's efforts to attach the crime to Tommy Skakel had proven futile. Their focus now shifted. Defenders of Littleton insist the continued harassment of the Greenwich Police--who frequently questioned Littleton while he was working--lead to his dismissal from teaching jobs.

Littleton probably did lose teaching jobs because of his status as a suspect and the Greenwich Police's continued efforts to build a case against him, but he has only himself to blame for their interest. His foolish crimes on Nantucket were a red flag to investigators. Furthermore, to this day, he has left many questions unanswered about his actions and whereabouts on the night of October 30, 1975."

Ken Littleton cleverly blames drinking problems for his "crime spree" but the truth is, alcohol was merely an aggravating factor, it is not the cause of his psychological disorder.

Ken Littleton was not the "wild card" he was the "wild man" who was never able to demonstrate the capacity to control his own life. To quote from the Sutton Report:

"Again, it is difficult to sift through the real and the paranoid when listening to the voice of Ken Littleton. We must remember, he is a man with a genetic and socio-cultural predisposition to bipolar mood disorder stemming from stressful occurrences, from which he now suffers. He is also a serious alcoholic, allegedly "recovering" through the assistance of twelve-step programs.

We must consider that Littleton may be a guilty man, haunted by his actions, who seeks for the sake of self-interest to protect himself by throwing speculation towards others. For all his problems and pitiable weaknesses, he is still an intelligent and potentially conniving convicted felon who has failed two lie-detector tests regarding the murder of Martha Moxley."

The possibility that Littleton is a completely innocent man, merely haunted by the specter of suspicion, is absolutely not credible, because Ken Littleton now claims he has direct knowledge of the fact that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley, a that is a huge departure from the previous claim that he hadn't noted anything suspicious.

Ken Littleton's consistent obsession to manufacture an alibi is a clear and convincing demonstration regarding the depth of Ken Littleton's criminal culpability.

Clearly, it is not possible to talk about Ken Littleton and crime spree in a separate breath, and the Sutton Report summarized some of the allegations in the following manner:

"Unfortunately, there are many issues with regards to Ken Littleton that need further investigation and clarification before any resolution can be reached as to his possible involvement in the murder of Martha Moxley. As mentioned earlier in this section, a great number of allegations and innuendos have been made against Littleton, particularly after Greenwich Police Detectives Soloman [Solomon] and Garr recently intensified their interest in him. According to Ken, he willingly submitted to their questioning, but finally relented after it was clear he was being given "the naked light-bulb treatment." Some of the allegations are as follows:

1) Ken Littleton had some sort of a sexual encounter with the wife of a fellow teacher from the Brunswick school at a softball picnic during the Spring of 1976. Although there were no charges brought, it has been alleged that Littleton was attempting to rape her. [Incidentally, Martha's panties were rolled down, exposing her in a vulgar manner, a sign that Ken Littleton had evidently treated her with the same level of disrespect.]

2) Other somewhat similar incidents of teenaged girls bludgeoned to death are alleged to have occurred in close proximity to Littleton's whereabouts.

3) Littleton was arrested for DWI and Assault and Battery, after having been driving the wrong way down a street frequented by prostitutes. He mumbled that 'he had to speak to the Kennedys.' "

It is extremely difficult to understand how this psychologically disturbed man who is obsessed with the Kennedys, has evaded criminal prosecution all his life, for the murder of Martha Moxley, but that does not change the fact that he evidently murdered Martha Moxley.

Clearly, Ken Littleton's troubled life would satisfy most reasonable people that he is a dangerous criminal who does not deserve life without supervision. To quote directly from the Sutton Report:

"1) Within a year of the murder, Littleton was given and failed two polygraph tests. At first, Littleton claimed he was being represented by Tommy's attorney, Manny Margolis, but then retained John Meerbergen.

2) After making a full confession with regards to his crime spree on Nantucket, Littleton is given a 5-7 year suspended sentence in May of 1977. He refused to submit to a sodium amytal interview regarding the murder of Martha Moxley in exchange for a reduced charge.

3) Littleton was arrested at least three times in Orlando, Florida. On February 14, 1982, his [WW] is convicted on charges of trespassing and disorderly conduct. When arrested, he gives a false name. On February 28, 1982, he is convicted of disorderly conduct again.

On March 3, 1982, Littleton is convicted of shoplifting. We know he was drinking heavily at this point.

4) In subsequent years, he was arrested for numerous Driving While Intoxicated offenses. The period when Littleton was in Florida, however, is of special portent. Martha Moxley's father, before his passing, recorded in his papers that Littleton called him at that time and expressed condolence for Martha's death, saying he wanted to take a sodium pentathol test to help solve the case. When asked about this call by our investigator in Boston, Littleton initially denied ever speaking with Mr. Moxley. He claimed that only his wife had actually spoke [sp] to Mr. Moxley. When later confronted with the specific recollections of the call from Mr. Moxley's personal papers, Littleton conceded he may have spoken to him while in a state of severe intoxication, stating, "Maybe I spoke to him when I was really shit-faced."

In the final analysis, the Sutton Report is a bizarre document because it implicates Ken Littleton through fact and clears him through speculation. It is time to recognize the facts.

Even the media has exposed the lunacy that governs Ken Littleton, and this is another, direct quote from the Sutton Report:

"A couple of years ago, the tabloid television program, A Current Affair, ambushed Littleton in Canada for an expose-style interview. Anxious, stuttering, and shaking uncontrollably, Ken initially tried to flee the encounter, but then awkwardly relented. He made a few comments and answered some questions while remaining just barely within the realm of coherence. He is a man who suffers from severe depression and alcoholism, and his demeanor is inherently disabled. In this regard, he is his own worst accuser."

In conclusion, the Sutton Report clearly indicates that the claim that Michael or Tommy Skakel had anything to do with the murder of Martha Moxley is subject to prejudicial analysis. The claim that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley is only subject to unanswered questions. It is time to answer the questions; Ken Littleton is his own worst accuser when it comes to trying to make any sense out of the murder of Martha Moxley.

Michael Skakel does not deserve to be in jail simply because Ken Littleton is a cunning liar and a very sick man.

edited 01-10-2009      

leave a message

 

 

TRAVEL
SHOP

Hearts in San Francisco Bay Area Living - Featuring Sunset LaserVue Eye Center mEL gIBSON Ronald Reagan  
nsnews 2009. All Rights Reserved

 
Newsworld Showdown -focus on the truth.

 
NEWSWORLD SHOWDOWN
Copyright 2007

 

 

 
  
 Cosmetics  |  Computers  |  Cameras  |  Music  |  Books  |  Software  |  Travel  |  Toys |  Games  |  Jewellery